(pb; 1967: movie
tie-in/novella collection)
From the back cover
“The Reptile
“From the steaming jungles of
Borneo to a remote Cornish village came the fiendish curse that turned a lovely
young girl into a nameless horror.
“Dracula – Prince of
Darkness
“Blood mingles with the ashes
and so becomes a life-giving force to the evil desires of a Vampire.
“Rasputin – The Mad Monk
“Hypnotist, seducer, libertine
and drunkard—he ruled the Tsar’s court like a devil incarnate.
“The Plague of the
Zombies
“Infamous Voodoo ritual casts
its barbarous shadow over a village of ‘the undead.’”
Overall review
Like its predecessor anthology, Second Hammer is worth owning and reading, with three of the four
based-on-screenplay novellas providing for excellent chills; the outlier tale, “Rasputin—The
Mad Monk,” is entertaining, vastly improved by Burke’s writing (as is “The
Reptile”) but “Rasputin” feels thin when compared to the others.
This slices of Gothic fun
and terror book is out of print as far as I know of, so if you’re curious
about it and see it for what you consider a reasonable price (do your
research), pick it up! You can always sell it to someone who (may) love it more
than you.
Review, novella by novella
The Reptile: Set
in summer 1902 in “the village of Clagmoor in Cornwall, England, known as
Larkrise,” a London couple (Harry and Valerie Spaulding) honeymoon in the
rustic cottage Harry inherited from his recently dead brother (Charles Edward
Spaulding), who died of a mysterious “heart attack.”
Once in Clagmoor, the newly
married Spauldings encounter hostility, passive and aggressive, from most of
the natives. One of them, inn keeper Tom Bailey, helps them when he can—whilst
treading carefully so as to not offend his fellow, longtime patrons. Then
there’s quietly hostile, emotionally strained Doctor Franklyn, a theologian, seemingly
abusive father of the “lovely” Anna, both of whom are hiding a deadly secret.
Will the Spauldings, with aid from Bailey, find out what’s going on with the
strange silence surrounding the plague of “heart attacks” which seem to strike
those around the Franklyns?
Like Burke’s four adaptations
in The Hammer Horror Omnibus (1966), “Reptile” is an
entertaining, waste-no-words and creepy-atmospheric tale, with
quick-sketch-but-effective characterization and fast-moving action. In the case
of “Reptile,” this is a vast improvement on its overlong,
thin-story-stretched-to-feature-length film; at best, it was an hourlong short.
Good read, especially for those familiar with the film version, or looking for
a quick-read Hammer Films Ltd. Fix.
The cinematic counterpart of the same
name debuted in England in February 1966; it was released stateside on April 6,
1966. The film was directed by John Gilling, from a screenplay by producer Anthony
Hinds.
“Dracula – Prince of
Darkness”: Charles and Diana Kent, a married couple, are traveling through
the Carpathian mountains with Charles’s more conservative brother (Alan) and
his shrew of a spouse (Helen) when ill luck befalls them and they find
themselves stranded near a castle that not only offers shelter from the
relentless rain and the dark forest but—dare they hope?—a telephone. Making
them further uneasy is the fact that earlier a local,
friendlier-than-other-villagers priest (Shandor) warned them not to go anywhere
near the castle but didn’t tell them why.
They quickly find out why they
were warned away but it’s too late, as Klove (the unsettling keeper of said
castle) reveals himself to be in the service of another, who’s been dead for
ten years: Dracula.
Burke again keeps the
characters and their (mis)fortunes fast-paced, bloody, Gothic and bold
(spectacle-wise) in the way that the best Hammer films are. This eighty-five-page
pulp adventure is a febrile and delectable ride with vivid descriptions that
thrill (e.g., “. . . making a last appeal to a thousand guardian demons”) and
titillate in equal proportion. Excellent adaptation of its source 1966 film,
which is also a blast, if I remember right (I haven’t seen it in a few years).
The film version, originally
titled Dracula, Prince of Darkness was helmed by Terence Fisher,
scripted by Jimmy Sangster and producer Anthony Hinds. It was released in
Britain in January 1966.
“Rasputin—The Mad Monk”:
Set in the early twentieth century (about 1916, the year the real-life Grigori
Rasputin was killed), this mix of historical fact and mostly fiction, “Rasputin”
is thinly plotted, character-study-intense story, with the titular odious and
greedy hypnotist grifter worming his way into the Tsarina’s St. Petersburg
court with help from a “struck off the medical register,” sometimes reluctant
Dr. Boris Zargo.
Others, including everyman
Peter Vassilievitch, set out to stop the lascivious, wily con artist. Can they
stop him before he makes everyone around him his puppet, slaves to his seemingly
inexhaustible desires?
Burke’s pulpy and tightly
edited writing elevates this thinly plotted, eighty-four-page story into something
worth reading (can’t comment on its 1966 source film iteration; I haven’t seen
it in decades). Solid, good read, this.
Don Sharp directed “Rasputin”’s
film version. Producer Anthony Hinds wrote the screenplay. It was released in
Britain on February 20,1966.
“The Plague of the Zombies”: Religion (Haitian voodoo), capitalism,
romance, their resulting zombies, and death come together in this (again)
tautly penned Gothic-in-a-Cornish-village story, solid in its themes, content
and overall delivery. This entertaining, fast-moving and excellent different
take on zombies is a great, short-ish (eighty-two pages long) tale, worth
owning and reading. I don’t remember the film which I haven’t seen in a while,
but I seem to remember thinking this is one of the better non-classic monsters horror
films Hammer put out.
Directed by John Gilling, “Plague”’s
cinematic counterpart received a wide release in Britain on January 9,
1966. Peter Bryan wrote its screenplay.