From
the back cover
“. . .
a high-minded criminal hits a Manhattan couple where it hurts the most when he
kidnaps their beloved black miniature poodle, Lisa, from Riverside Park. Ed
Reynolds, a forty-two-year-old editor at a prestigious publishing house,
returns home one night to find a note: ‘Dear Sir. I have your dog Lisa. She is
well and happy. . . I gather she is important to you? We’ll se.’ and so the
nightmare begins for the Reynolds couple in this harrowing portrait of mid-century
urban life shattered by a single bizarre event.”
Review
Ransom
is
an okay read. Highsmith, as usual, takes a standard thriller setup and restructures,
shakes it up, with her analytical, incisive genre-mixing tone and style.
The main
villain, Kenneth Rowajinski, reminds me a lot of the emotional/criminal
journeys of other Highsmith characters─namely, Walter Stackhouse from her 1954 novel
The Blunderer as well as young Tom Ripley in The Talented Mr. Ripley
(1955). Her distinctive setup reminds me of her excellent 1983 novel People Who Knock on the Door, with its long, steady build into murder and further
tragedy, as well as its effective takedown of middle-class smugness and
over-reliance on material comfort.
That
said, Ransom is not as good as People, at least for this reader.
I could not relate to most of the characters, whose actions and outlooks were
apathetic, callous, needy, languid (in that Highsmithian way) and overtly
self-destructive. I “get” that we are viewing things through her lens, but none
of these characters have redeeming qualities. It’s all various shades of
darkness, ignorance and other negative elements─in a phrase, a hundred-percent nihilistic.
It does not help that Highsmith has one of her less odious characters, Clarence Pope
Duhamell, think: “A pity that New York had been overrun by blacks and Puerto
Ricans instead of by some race that might have improved things.” This is not
the only part with racist rumblings. While she is reflecting the spirit of the
age (and most ages), it felt unnecessarily ugly.
Ransom is
worth reading, if you don’t mind Highsmith’s into-a-void misanthropy and unlikeable
characters. The style and writing are fine, for the most part, but its darkness
is a bit much, even for Highsmith.
No comments:
Post a Comment