(pb; 2022: movie tie-in)
From the back cover
“The town of Haddonfield still lives in the shadow of Michael Myers. It has been four years since he mysteriously vanished. As Laurie attempts to put the tragedies of her past behind her, Allyson is desperate to get away from life with her grandmother in the dead-end town scorched by bloodshed.
“When local outcast Corey
Cunningham discovers the truth of Michael’s whereabouts, he inadvertently
unleashes a new wave of violence. With Haddonfield once more the backdrop to
murderous impulses, Allyson endeavors to escape as Laurie prepares for one
final confrontation with her boogeyman.”
Review
Logan, one of the screenwriters for the film version, is a mostly solid writer as far as expanding the story’s details and the background characters’ backgrounds (giving them names when they didn’t have them in the film, e.g., Christopher Nelson, the sewer bum who takes care of Michael Myers, and has a briefly linked past with the iconic killer). Unfortunately, Logan’s mostly solid writing can’t fix a disjointed story, with lead characters who, even if they changed in four years, feel like entirely different/new characters when compared to the first two films/novels—it’s as if the first two films/novels might as well as not existed, that this is not part of a wrap-up for the Halloween franchise. Rather, it feels like a side story that could’ve been titled Corey Cunningham: F**k-Up, with shoehorned appearances by Michael Myers, and a ridiculous final fate for Michael (which might’ve worked in a better-written film).
Ends, like its film version counterpart, has two competing storylines that should not exist within the same work. It’s like the screenwriters wanted to do a side film (that shouldn’t even be part of this supposed trilogy end-film/book) that also briefly showed Myers and a boring—yes, boring— and half-assed retread of Laurie Strode’s more-thrilling confrontations with Myers in Halloween (1978) and Halloween (2018). It’s nice that the filmmakers wanted to try something different (even beyond what they did in Halloween Kills, 2021) but this storyline is misguided, not scary, a “social message” Myers-has-new-psychic-powers film with truncated/badly patched-together scenes that add up to utter crap. If they’d stuck with Cunningham’s story (minus the possessed-with-Myers’s-evil element) it would’ve been an interesting Halloween side-story (perhaps titled Tales of Haddonfield) work. But it’s not. It’s disjointed, a betrayal of what went before with the characters (never mind the fact that Ends should’ve focused on Allyson, Laurie Strode’s granddaughter, like it did on the first two films, keeping with trilogic consistency).
Don’t waste your time with this unless you consider this a side Halloween alternate-universe work. Additionally, given Halloween Kills’s cliffhanger ending, it might be best to pretend Kills doesn’t exist, that John Passarella’s novelization of Halloween (2018) was the thus-far final (and worthwhile) entry in the Halloween franchise.
No comments:
Post a Comment